Executive Workshop
Three hours, up to eight people who can change the system, before any evidence is gathered.
You own: The shape of the problem, in writing.
€6,000flat
Creditable against a Diagnosis if one is commissioned within 30 days.
Six engagement models for designing, diagnosing and scaling B2B commercial systems. Which one fits depends on whether the system is still emerging, already under strain or changing shape.
What changes is how far the work goes: reading the system, pricing what it costs, or carrying the change through.
You do not leave with recommendations. You leave with something that stands on its own.
Three hours, up to eight people who can change the system, before any evidence is gathered.
You own: The shape of the problem, in writing.
€6,000flat
Creditable against a Diagnosis if one is commissioned within 30 days.
Interviews, the operating records you already produce, and your own internal rates.
You own: Five outputs and one decision, not a deck.
€12,000flat
Six to eight weeks from evidence access to the leadership briefing.
Strategy, roles, handoffs, process, data, governance and operating cadence.
You own: The first commercial operating model, and the reasoning the next leader inherits.
€30,000flat
For companies selling successfully without a system anyone could hand over.
The scoped Diagnosis, then implementation of its roadmap inside your own system.
You own: The change implemented, and measured against its own baseline.
€55,000flat
The diagnostic is included in this price rather than added to it.
Recurring diagnosis, implementation support and capability development, cycle after cycle.
You own: Capability built into your own leaders rather than rented.
€7,500per month
Six-month term. A partnership that cannot end has stopped being useful.
Sales execution, commercial leadership, system literacy and cross-functional coordination.
You own: A standard the team can apply without us.
€8,000flat
Applies where the capability gap has already been named.
They describe the state of your commercial system rather than the size of your company. Where one is missing, that is said in the first conversation rather than after a scope is proposed.
One difficult quarter is an episode. The same failure across deals is a system.
Interviews, operating records and financial data. Without access, a finding cannot be defended.
Roles, handoffs and ownership have to be changeable by someone in the room.
Where the decision is made and only needs justifying, this is not that.
Not on the list: company size, headcount or revenue. A ten-person team and a much larger one can carry the same coordination failure.
Five steps, applied at different depths. The framework is how Kihon works; the methodology underneath it is ISEOR/SEAM's, set out with its attribution on the framework page →
Every enquiry gets a written reply with the honest next step, including no engagement.
A Diagnosis runs from evidence access to leadership briefing in six to eight weeks, and ends in a decision rather than a deck.
Findings, the cost model and the roadmap stand on their own. You can execute them with anyone.
What the evidence could not establish is stated beside what it did, so a number can be defended when it is challenged.
Use 30 minutes to define the operating question, test what evidence exists and decide whether Kihon has a role at all. No scope is proposed before that is clear.
Discuss the operating problem