Baseline
What was measured before the work started, with the sources and the assumptions used.
ISEOR's published results, as printed at the source, and what a case states before it is published here. Each is read against where it started, its limits beside the outcome.
The method Kihon applies has been measured in the field since 1978. These are ISEOR's published results, reproduced with the limits the source itself states.
Reduction in hidden costs, reconverted into savings and revenue growth, measured across all evaluated pilot actions. ISEOR does not say over what period or in what kind of organisation, so it reads as a spread across cases rather than a promise for any one of them.
A small team inside a larger pilot action, valued across three indicators: absenteeism reduced to a 3% sickness rate (€800), scrap and defect rates halved (€3,200), and direct productivity up 16.2% (€7,700). Delivery time fell by two and a half weeks, which the source leaves unvalued.
The field record the research has built up since 1978, in organisations from 4 to 30,000 people.
ISEOR's database shows that lost revenue makes up at least half of the hidden costs measured in companies, so recovering them means above all selling more, not only spending less. ISEOR has applied the method to commercial teams: its 2016 colloquium on selling, "everyone sells", published cases from Manpower Belgium-Luxembourg, Nutrisens, SLB Médical, Brioche Pasquier and the IT services firm Deuzzi.
Savall and Zardet, Renouveau du contrôle de gestion, p. 18 → Innovation commerciale, EMS 2017 →What these figures are, and are not: ISEOR's measurements across four decades of intervention research. ISEOR notes on the same page that its published results understate the effect, given the time limits of the evaluations. A B2B company arrives at its own number the same way these did, through the fieldwork that establishes it. View the ISEOR source →
A case is not written after the work; it is set up on the first day of it. The number it ends with is read against the number the Diagnosis recorded, in the same records, by the same method.
All six, or the case stays unpublished. Where it started, how long it was watched and what it cannot show count as much as the result.
What was measured before the work started, with the sources and the assumptions used.
The recurring problem the diagnostic found, and how other explanations were tested.
What was changed, including what did not work.
What changed against where it started, with measured results kept apart from estimates, forecasts or interpretation.
How long the change was observed, and whether it held after the work ended.
What the case cannot establish, where uncertainty remains, and what the client authorised. Published beside the outcome, not beneath it.
Kihon's own cases: published with the company named, its own before-and-after numbers, and the company's sign-off on the text.
A Diagnosis sets the starting point a case would later be measured against. Where the evidence will not reach a finding, that is said before any proposal.