Case Studies
Real organisations. Measured change. Stated limits. A case is published here only when it can be traced to its baseline and the client has authorised what may be shown.
The record the method comes from
Source boundary: ISEOR's published record, in organisations from 4 to 30,000 people. Not a Kihon client result. View the ISEOR source →
What the method has been measured to produce, in the record it comes from.
The method Kihon applies has been measured in the field since 1978. These are ISEOR's published results, reproduced with the limits the source itself states.
€20,000 to €70,000 per person per year
Reduction in hidden costs, reconverted into savings and revenue growth, measured across all evaluated pilot actions. ISEOR does not state a single timeframe or organisational context for the range, so it reads as a spread across cases rather than a promise for any one of them.
€11,700 per person per year
A small team inside a larger pilot action, valued across three indicators: absenteeism reduced to a 3% sickness rate (€800), scrap and defect rates halved (€3,200), and direct productivity up 16.2% with delivery time down two and a half weeks (€7,700).
2,125+ organisations, 72 sectors, 46 countries
The field record the intervention research has accumulated since 1978, in organisations from 4 to 30,000 people.
What these figures are, and are not: ISEOR's measurements across four decades of intervention research. ISEOR records that its own results are understated given the time constraints of the study. A B2B commercial system arrives at its own number the same way these did, through the fieldwork that establishes it. View the ISEOR source →
Six things every case has to state.
The collection schema requires each one. A case that cannot state its baseline, observation period or limits does not build.
Baseline
What was measured before the intervention, with the evidence sources and calculation assumptions used.
Diagnosed condition
The recurring organisational condition the diagnostic established, and how competing explanations were tested.
Intervention
What was actually changed, including material adjustments and approaches that did not work.
Measured outcome
What changed against the baseline, distinguishing measured result from estimate, forecast or interpretation.
Observation period
How long the change was observed, and whether it held beyond the immediate intervention period.
Limitations
What the case cannot establish, where uncertainty remains, and what the client authorised. Published beside the outcome, not beneath it.
What would this look like for your system?
A Diagnosis sets the baseline a case would later be measured against. Where the evidence will not reach a finding, that is said before scope is proposed.
Start the conversation