Proof of Work

What the method rests on, and what it does not yet claim.

Three kinds of evidence matter here, and they are not the same kind. What the method has behind it. What the practitioner has behind him. And what has not been published yet, stated plainly rather than filled with something weaker.

The method

The method's record is inherited, not claimed.

The socio-economic approach was developed by Henri Savall, Véronique Zardet, and the ISEOR research team, associated with Université Jean Moulin Lyon 3. Its record across more than five decades belongs to that research lineage, not Kihon Labs.

Kihon Labs' contribution is the commercial and revenue-system adaptation, intended to be tested and refined through doctoral research. The underlying method and its evidence remain clearly attributed to their original sources.

The practitioner

Five years inside the systems this method reads.

Field record

Commercial roles held inside Veritas, SAP, Preply, and Delfos Energy, across enterprise software, an EdTech marketplace, and renewable energy in European and Turkish markets. These are career environments, not Kihon Labs client results.

Growth stages

Four distinct growth-stage environments worked inside rather than observed: enterprise, scale-up, expansion, and early growth. The diagnostic reads transitions because the transitions were worked through.

Teaching record

Postgraduate and undergraduate teaching at four business schools in Barcelona, across Strategic Sales Management, Customer Experience Management, and Leadership.

Research standing

Incoming Executive DBA candidate at EADA Business School, in a programme delivered in partnership with Le CNAM-Paris, admitted with a merit scholarship. The diagnostic is the subject of that research, not a byproduct of it.

Stated plainly

There are no published client cases on this page.

The practice is new, and the engagements that would produce publishable cases are in front of it rather than behind it. Filling this space with reworded field anecdotes or unnamed composite clients would be a small dishonesty in a practice whose entire proposition is that its numbers can be defended.

So this section stays empty until there is something real to put in it.

What will appear here

  • A named or explicitly anonymised client, with their written permission
  • The baseline figure established at diagnosis, and the method used to reach it
  • The intervention actually executed, including what was tried and did not work
  • The measured result against that baseline, not an estimate and not a projection
  • The time elapsed, so the reader can judge whether the change held

If a case cannot meet all five, it will not be published here.

In the meantime

Three ways to test this without taking anyone's word for it.

Point it at your own system

The Strain Check runs the same six families over ten questions, free and instant. It is a shallow read, but it is a read of your system rather than someone else's.

Take the Strain Check →

Read the method and find the seam

The methodology page shows where the framework comes from and what it does not claim. It cites its sources, which means it can be checked.

Read the methodology →

Ask the hard question on a call

Thirty minutes, no deck. Bring the objection you would raise if you were trying to talk yourself out of this.

Book a call →

Three kinds of evidence, two that exist and one stated plainly as absent Three stacked bands. The method's record and the practitioner's record are drawn as solid bands, because they exist and can be checked. Published client cases are drawn as an empty dashed outline, marked none published yet, because none exist so far. The absent band is highlighted rather than hidden. The method's record SEAM research across more than five decades, cited to its sources The practitioner's record B2B field experience and doctoral research in development Published client cases none yet; future cases require client permission
Three kinds of evidence, two that exist and one stated plainly as absent Three stacked bands. The method's record and the practitioner's record are solid, because they exist and can be checked. Published client cases are an empty dashed outline, marked none published yet, because none exist so far. The absent band is highlighted rather than hidden. The method's record cited to its sources The practitioner's record field and doctoral research in development Published client cases none yet; client permission required
FAQ

About the absence of case studies.

Why is there no published case study yet?
The practice is new, and the engagements that would produce one are still in front of it. Publishing a reworded field anecdote instead would undercut the one claim this page makes, that the numbers can be defended.
What has to be true before a case gets published?
A named or explicitly anonymised client with written permission, a stated baseline and method, the intervention as it actually ran, and a measured result against that baseline. If any of those is missing, it does not get published.
What can you offer as a reference in the meantime?
The field record and growth-stage range described above, the teaching record, and the incoming doctoral research position. None of those substitute for a client case, they are simply what exists to check today.
How do we judge the method without a case study to point to?
Run the Strain Check against your own system, read the methodology to see where the framework is cited from, or bring the hardest objection to a call. All three test the method directly rather than asking you to trust a summary.
Where to go next

While the case studies are being built.

Read the methodology

The full ISEOR-based method behind the diagnostic, and the research lineage it comes from.

Read the methodology →

See what gets measured

The six dysfunction families, the signals that reveal them, and how they convert into cost. See what will be examined before deciding whether the full audit is worth running.

See the Diagnosis →

Test your own system

A ten-question strain check that shows which part of your commercial system is carrying the most load.

Run the Strain Check →

Get started

The first published case will be someone's. It could be yours.

One call, 30 minutes. We will review what is working, what is stalling, and where the cost is actually sitting. You will leave with a concrete next step, whether that is Kihon Labs or not.

Book a diagnostic call